![]() The primary legal issues in those cases, once the placement of the Pinto's fuel tanks above the rear axle's were proven to have been a causal link in the fires, were: (i) Ford's degree of responsibility under a strict liability theory for product defects which created safety hazards but which may not have violated then existing federal safety standards and (ii) whether and to what extent Ford's knowledge of the safety hazards involved was sufficient to warrant the imposition of punitive damages. 348 (1981), Ford was adjudged liable for compensatory and punitive damages arising out of injuries and fatalities involving Ford Pintos which caught fire after rear-end collisions on the highways. Ford Motor Company, 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 174 Cal.Rptr. ![]() In a series of civil tort suits filed in the 1970s, the most important of which was Grimshaw v. This case analysis report discusses the legal and ethical issues raised by the conduct of Ford Motor Company ("Ford") in connection with its design, manufacture, marketing, public relations and other activities relating to the Ford Pinto. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |